On 10/25/06, Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more thing I meant to add: I find it hard to review
other people's doc changes when they are posted as DITA
diffs only, because I'm not that practiced reading DITA
diffs. So I think the preferred way to post doc patches
for review is something like:
- make the change and run the build, to generate HTML
- attach the svn diff and stat output, as usual
- *also* attach the generated html pages, so reviewers
can see how the docs will look without having to build
the HTML themselves.
thanks,
bryan
I appreciate your input and comments. I think that attaching the HTML
pages is very important for reviewing patches. I will add that
recommendation to the "Documentation" pages for Derby when I post all
of the updates.
Thanks!
--
Laura Stewart
