[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2042?page=comments#action_12447591 ] Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-2042: --------------------------------------
I understand completely. Several of us (Kim Haase and myself) are trying to update the documentation to be more consistent. It is best if you model your topic after GRANT or REVOKE which were added in 10.2.1.6. They have the most current "look and feel" that we are going for. All in all, you did a good job :-) > Provide documentation for new RENAME COLUMN statement > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2042 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2042 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation > Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0 > Reporter: Bryan Pendleton > Assigned To: Bryan Pendleton > Priority: Minor > Attachments: renameColumnDoc_v1.diff, > rrefsqljrenamecolumnstatement.html > > > DERBY-1490 proposes to add a new RENAME COLUMN statement. Assuming that such > a statement is added, we need to update the documentation to describe this > new statement. DERBY-1490 describes the behavior of the statement in detail; > this issue is just to track the documentation, which I intend to address > separately after the DERBY-1490 changes are committed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
