Very good point. I'll open another issue, though I think I will wait till after 1920 is done to avoid excessive confusion.

Kim

Laura Stewart wrote:
Hi Kim  -

I don't want to reopen this issue since these are different problems
than 2013 addressed.  I also don't think that you should bury them in
1920.  When I first started on Derby, I was told to try to keep the
updates consistent with the JIRA issue. Making additional significant
changes makes it difficult for the originator of the issue to
review/comment and approve.

So I recommend creating a new issue to address the things that you
mention below :-)

On 1/6/07, Kim Haase (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462718 ]

Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2013:
----------------------------------

The reorganization is really great, Laura -- I think it makes the manual a lot easier to use. Adding the new header topics helps a lot.

I notice a few minor ordering issues.

1) The SUM and TAN functions need to be switched for alphabetical order.

2) The system functions and procedures are not in alphabetical order. Is there some reason why not?

3) The JDBC reference section isn't in alphabetical order either. It might make sense to reorder it to correspond with the javadoc (which separates interfaces, classes, and exceptions into subgroups and orders them alphabetically). I'd also suggest putting java.sql.Driver.getPropertyInfo in a subtopic under java.sql.Driver.

If you don't want to reopen this issue (these are sort of far afield from the original issue of statement order), I could make some or all of the fixes as part of DERBY-1920.




Reply via email to