Hi Laura,
No table of contents with page numbers with the new dita0T existed;
although I was also using FOP.93 which didn't create the index either
(with either DITA 1.2.x and 1.3.x). A lot of the functionality in the
derby docs are a patch to DITA in both 1.2.x versions and before. I did
use a program called meld:
http://meld.sourceforge.net/
to look at the differences between the patched 1.2.x (the patches are
replacement files in the doc trunk /lib), and wasn't certain it was
worth moving everything over).
So, to get stuff like the index, derby 1.2.x patches need to be moved
over to DITA1.3.x. Sort of a time consuming process, as a lot of the
diffs are the same (somewhat) although they might not look like it. I
think some of the DITAOTx.x.x differences are post derby changes, as I
think Jeff worked with some of the people doing the DITA work.
scott
Laura Stewart wrote:
On 1/12/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
scott hutinger wrote:
> BTW, I did a build without patches in a pdf file, and the top
header is
> the name of the document title, not the copyright title.
> 'Getting Started with Derby' was on every page where the word
Copyright
> currently is. Of course some of the items that the patches fix,
such as
> table of contents links, title page etc, were broken compared to
what is
> the norm. Something takes the <title> and puts in in the header.
>
> I think the title on top of the page might be a better idea(?)
I agree title would be better.
-jean
Scott - did your output generate an index?
When I used the new toolkit, the PDF did not include an index.
