[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493380
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2603:
----------------------------------------
Could you expand on why you think that "binary" should be replaced by "boolean"?
I understand "binary" to describe the number of *arguments* that the operator
has.
I understand "boolean" to describe the *result* of the operator.
Thus, to me, the two words are not easily interchangeable, so I'm
interested to understand more about the issue as you see it.
Thanks!
> Minor erratum in page of VARCHAR in Derby Reference manual
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2603
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Environment:
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/rrefsqlj41207.html
> Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
> Priority: Minor
>
> I found next statement in the page through translation into Japanese.
> > When binary comparison operators are applied to VARCHARs, the lengths of
> > the operands are not altered, and spaces at the end of the values are
> > ignored.
> I think "binary" should be replaced as "boolean".
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
