[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547172
]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-3083:
--------------------------------------
Hi Knut. I don't know if you can reverse the order of (3) and (4). That might
work. If it does, I agree that it's a better plan.
If we have to perform (3) first, then yes I think we need a system property to
bootstrap the SecurityManager and point it at the dummy policy. I think that
setPolicy would only have to be granted to the protection domain which contains
the server.
But I think the first experiment would be to reverse the order of (3) and (4)
as you suggest.
> Network server demands a file called "derbynet.jar" in classpath
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3083
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3083
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Tools
> Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
> Reporter: Aaron Digulla
> Attachments: derby-3083-01-requireDerbynet-aa.diff,
> derby-3083-01-requireDerbynet-ab.diff, derby-716-10-datatypesCollation-aa.diff
>
>
> The network server will not start if the derbynet jar is added under a
> different name than "derbynet.jar" to the classpath. This makes it impossible
> to use it in maven projects where the jar is renamed to
> "derbynet-10.3.1.4.jar".
> This did work with 10.2.2.0
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
