[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560477#action_12560477
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-3323:
---------------------------------------
Ole, do you have the .out file from the failure? I am not able to reproduce
and maybe the output will give a clue as to the problem. Also there is an
ongoing discussion regarding this test in DERBY-3316
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3316?focusedCommentId=12560009#action_12560009
I would like to move the test back to derbyall until it can be properly
converted to JUnit with the low memory heap. Unfortunately now it is not
testing what it was intended to test because it runs with the heap allocated by
the suite jvm. I don't know if such a move would make any difference in the
intermittent failure. Dan are you still opposed to the move back to derbyall
given my comments in DERBY-3316?
> ComparisonFailure in derbyStress
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3323
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3323
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Regression Test Failure
> Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
> Environment: jvm1.4 lin
> jvm1.5 lin, linN+1
> vm1.6 sles,sol, solN+1
> jvm1.5 w2003
> Reporter: Ole Solberg
> Priority: Minor
>
> See
> jvm1.4 lin :
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/FailReports/612516_bySig.html
> jvm1.5 lin, jvm1.5 linN+1 :
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/FailReports/612516_bySig.html
> jvm1.6 sles, jvm1.6 sol, jvm1.6 solN+1:
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.6/FailReports/612516_bySig.html
> jvm1.5 w2003:
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.3Branch/jvm1.5/FailReports/612526_bySig.html
> 1)
> derbyStress(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbcapi.JDBCHarnessJavaTest)junit.framework.ComparisonFailure:
> Output at line 6 expected:<[Test derbyStress finished.]> but was:<[FAIL --
> unexpected exception ****************]>
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.CanonTestCase.compareCanon(CanonTestCase.java:100)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.HarnessJavaTest.runTest(HarnessJavaTest.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:96)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestSetup.run(BaseTestSetup.java:57)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestSetup.run(BaseTestSetup.java:57)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
