Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
I wonder what the criteria are to get things on this wiki? Is it just
up to whomever wants to add or remove something there?
Pretty Much. This is a description of the page:
This Wiki page is where members of the development community and those
involved in support and QA can list fixes that they see as giving a
potentially high return on time investment based on:
*
Frequency and likelihood the issue might be hit by users.
*
Estimated difficulty of fix.
*
Risk to existing users if the fix is implemented.
*
Severity of the issue.
*
Availability of a workaround.
*
The amount of user/developer time is wasted by the issue.
Just a smaller list for bug fixers to look at if they don't want to go
through the 302 open bugs that we have.
For instance, DERBY-1482 is marked as minor, and has no
watchers/voters...I'd remove it...(still needs to get fixed, of
course, I just wonder about the "high value").
I saw it as a likely user hit, but perhaps you are right, since nobody
has seemed to have hit it so far, maybe it doesn't qualify.
Kathey
