On 1/17/08, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Ok, as you may have noticed I have updated the HighValueFixCandidates > > page with a status column. (Most are still open unfortunately). For now > > I have just created a link from the Bug fixing section of the 10.4 wiki > > page. > > > > > I tend to think it is best to remove the resolved and perhaps even in > progress issues from the list. I think it should just be a list of fix > candidates. Otherwise the list gets too long to be useful. > > Kathey > > > I wonder what the criteria are to get things on this wiki? Is it just up to whomever wants to add or remove something there? For instance, DERBY-1482 is marked as minor, and has no watchers/voters...I'd remove it...(still needs to get fixed, of course, I just wonder about the "high value").
Myrna
