Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> I did some experimenting, and here are the results: >> Alt A: >> With maint=0000001 and beta=true >> 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861) >> >> Alt B: >> With maint=0000001 and beta=false >> 10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M) >> >> Alt C: >> With maint=1000001 and beta=true >> 10.4.1.1 beta - (635861M) >> >> Alt D: >> With maint=1000001 and beta=false >> 10.4.1.1 - (635861M) >> >> So I thought alt. A was correct for the period from when the branch is >> cut up to the point when the first RC is spun (targetted for >> 2008-04-04), alt. C for the RC and alt. D for the final release. > > The release candidate should not have the beta flag. As long as it has > the beta flag it can't be released and therefore cannot be a candidate > for release... :) > >> But based on the comments I take it that I should go immediately to alt. >> C, and that alt. D should be used for the RC. If someone confirms this >> I can check in the change to release.properties and update the Wiki. > > Sounds reasonable to me. Although I had expected the last digit to be 0, > not 1 (we did release 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0, as far as I remember).
I don't know why it shouldn't be 0. But following the old instructions on the Wiki (either by running maintversion2props directly, or by doing ant bumplastdigit in tools/relase, which seems to be doing the same thing) I ended up with the last digit being 1... If it should in fact, be 0, then I have to ask that someone tells me exaclty what to do, step by step, so that I can re-write the Wiki from scratch... -- dt
