[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did some experimenting, and here are the results:
Alt A: With maint=0000001 and beta=true
10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861)
Alt B:
With maint=0000001 and beta=false
10.4.0.1 alpha - (635861M)
Alt C:
With maint=1000001 and beta=true
10.4.1.1 beta - (635861M)
Alt D:
With maint=1000001 and beta=false
10.4.1.1 - (635861M)
Hi Dyre,
This part of our release process seems to trip up every new release
manager and the instructions could use some improvement. My
understanding of bumplastdigit is this: you run it after you generate
a candidate and it sets up the release id for the next candidate. In
any event, with or without bumping the last digit, option (C) produces
a release id that looks good to me.
OK, so your vote goes to C':
With maint=1000000 and beta=true
10.4.1.0 beta - (635861M)
?
Hi Dyre,
To me that looks like a good id for a beta candidate. +1.
Regards,
-Rick
