[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Kim Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Good catches, Rick. Should there be a a JIRA issue for this? Or >> perhaps more than one? I think only the first two are specific to the >> docs. Also, which NOTICE are we talking about? The one in the code >> trunk seems to have been updated, and the one in the docs trunk >> doesn't have a copyright notice. > > I'm wondering how much of this is covered by step 1 under > 'Check-ins just before generating release artifacts' in the relase > instructions on the Wiki: > > http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease
Those instructions are actually a bit terse. The actual wording is "Also adjust version numbers in documentation by modifying the appropriate *conrefs.dita files." There are actually a number of such files [EMAIL PROTECTED]/derby/docs-10.4$ find . -name '*conrefs.dita' ./src/ja_JP/getstart/gsconrefs.dita ./src/ja_JP/conrefs.dita ./src/pt_BR/adminguide/adminconrefs.dita ./src/pt_BR/ref/refconrefs.dita ./src/pt_BR/getstart/gsconrefs.dita ./src/conrefs.dita ./conrefs.dita I assume that only those under src are of interest. Seems only two files actually conatin the string '10.3': M src/conrefs.dita M src/ja_JP/conrefs.dita If that's all that needs to be done, I can check in the change. > > I didn't do that for the beta, since it is listed as something you do > when creating the release candidate. But I guess those files might as well > have > been updated right after cutting the branch... (and possibly updated > later). > >> >> Kim >> >> Rick Hillegas wrote: >>> I have downloaded the source distribution of the 10.4 beta and have >>> a couple comments. After unpacking this distribution, I was able to >>> build the docs and I was able to generate a release. The links from >>> index.html worked. So the structure of the beta looks good to >>> me. The release notes looked sketchy, but I've already sent mail >>> about that. In addition, the following looked odd: >>> >>> o In the user guides, should "Copyright 2004-2007" be changed to >>> "Copyright 2004-2008"? >>> >>> o The version number in the user documentation is 10.3, not 10.4 >>> >>> o In the JDBC3 public api, there's a spurious line just before the >>> title of the top-left frame. The line reads: 'Apache Derby 10.4 API >>> Documentation">' >>> >>> o The NOTICE file says "Copyright 2004-2007". Should that be changed >>> to "Copyright 2004-2008"? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Rick >> > > -- > dt > -- dt
