Kim Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good catches, Rick. Should there be a a JIRA issue for this? Or > perhaps more than one? I think only the first two are specific to the > docs. Also, which NOTICE are we talking about? The one in the code > trunk seems to have been updated, and the one in the docs trunk > doesn't have a copyright notice.
I'm wondering how much of this is covered by step 1 under 'Check-ins just before generating release artifacts' in the relase instructions on the Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease I didn't do that for the beta, since it is listed as something you do when creating the release candidate. But I guess those files might as well have been updated right after cutting the branch... (and possibly updated later). > > Kim > > Rick Hillegas wrote: >> I have downloaded the source distribution of the 10.4 beta and have >> a couple comments. After unpacking this distribution, I was able to >> build the docs and I was able to generate a release. The links from >> index.html worked. So the structure of the beta looks good to >> me. The release notes looked sketchy, but I've already sent mail >> about that. In addition, the following looked odd: >> >> o In the user guides, should "Copyright 2004-2007" be changed to >> "Copyright 2004-2008"? >> >> o The version number in the user documentation is 10.3, not 10.4 >> >> o In the JDBC3 public api, there's a spurious line just before the >> title of the top-left frame. The line reads: 'Apache Derby 10.4 API >> Documentation">' >> >> o The NOTICE file says "Copyright 2004-2007". Should that be changed >> to "Copyright 2004-2008"? >> >> Thanks, >> -Rick > -- dt
