John H. Embretsen wrote:
I'd say leave it as is then. It's not worth opening up a potential security hole.the permission will have to be set for a wildcard address (*) even if it is only pinging itself on the loopback interface.
Kathey
John H. Embretsen wrote:
I'd say leave it as is then. It's not worth opening up a potential security hole.the permission will have to be set for a wildcard address (*) even if it is only pinging itself on the loopback interface.
Kathey