[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12643183#action_12643183
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-3193:
--------------------------------------
> rrefkeywords29722.html (SQL reserved words): Add ROLE to
> list. (Oddly, CURRENT_ROLE is already on the list.)
I added this for 10.4 since the parser had been modified although the
roles feature did not go in at that time. I don't think ROLE should be
added, since it is strangely enough not a reserved keyword, just a
keyword according to the standard, cf. SQL 2003, section 5.2: the
production "<non-reserved word>" contains "ROLE", whereas the production
"<reserved word>" contains both "NONE" and "CURRENT_ROLE". (which is
the way I implemented it)
> SQL roles: Add documentation
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3193
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Documentation
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Kim Haase
> Fix For: 10.5.0.0
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
