[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662203#action_12662203
]
myrna edited comment on DERBY-4004 at 1/8/09 5:03 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have not looked at this thoroughly, but I have one comment: are the new .inc
files run as part of the ProtocolTest
(see DERBY-2031)?
was (Author: myrna):
I have not looked at this thoroughly, but I have one comment: is this run
as part of the new ProtocolTest
(see DERBY-2031)?
> Remove required RDBNAM from ACCSEC. Use SECCHK RDBNAM if none is provided on
> ACCSEC
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4004
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Network Client, Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Assignee: Kathey Marsden
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: derby-4004_diff.txt
>
>
> Currently Derby requires RDBNAM on ACCSEC. The DDM spec lists it as optional.
> For DERBY-728, in order to negotiate the encoding, EXCSAT and ACCSEC will
> need to remain EBCDIC, so we want the RDBNAM to be optional. We can use the
> RDBNAM sent in SECCHK instead.
> Once this is done. Client can be changed to only send RDBNAM on ACCSEC if an
> EBCDIC conversion is possible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
