[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741988#action_12741988
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4345:
--------------------------------------
Hi Lily, I made a new comment on DERBY-3532 regarding your question. I guess
this issue can be closed? If you think it should work even without the
semicolon (not sure if that's desirable - the lone semicolon is a way of
stating there is an empty database name, implying engine), you could rename
this issue to track that..
> Inconsistent behavior regarding shutting down embedded engine from
> ClientDataSource and ClientDriver/DriverManager
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4345
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.5.1.1
> Environment: Windows Vista with JDK 1.6
> Reporter: Lily Wei
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: ReproDerby3532.java, ReproDerby4345.java
>
>
> When investigate DERBY-3532, Kathey and I found inconsistent behavior in turn
> of connection modes possible to shut down the engine underneath the network
> server. Currently, users can shutdown from the client remotely with
> ClientDataSource but not with ClientDriver/DriverManager. The two should be
> the same.
> Should we disable the capability for ClientDataSource or enable it for
> ClientDriver? I am leaning toward to disable the capability for
> ClientDataSource. However, I am not sure about the risk of functionality
> disable impact for existing production customers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
