Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes: > I agree that most developers won't care about this file. It is > interesting archeology for release managers, though.
The most interesting thing in the list is that the 10.5.3.0 artifacts are broken, and that 10.5.3.0_1 should be used instead. I think this is something that would interest our users too, which may suggest that we shouldn't hide this information in the source repository? -- Knut Anders
