Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes: > Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: >> Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >>> I agree that most developers won't care about this file. It is >>> interesting archeology for release managers, though. >>> >> >> The most interesting thing in the list is that the 10.5.3.0 artifacts >> are broken, and that 10.5.3.0_1 should be used instead. I think this is >> something that would interest our users too, which may suggest that we >> shouldn't hide this information in the source repository? >> >> > I agree that users would be interested in knowing that 10.5.3.0_1 is > the good distribution and 10.5.3.0 has been deprecated. Where would a > typical maven user expect to find that information? I don't use maven > much, so I don't think I could answer that question.
I have no idea about the Maven users, but I suppose a typical Derby user would scan the Derby website and the wiki. That said, I haven't been able to find any information on our website/wiki on how to add Derby to your Maven project, or any mentioning that we have Maven artifacts for that matter, so I don't think we have any natural place to add this information right now. -- Knut Anders
