[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12993439#comment-12993439
 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4869:
-------------------------------------------

Hi Rick,

On a machine that has shown this failure in the nightly tests (the SUSE box), I 
ran the test 100 times successfully without your fix, so I'm not sure how to 
reproduce it easily.

I'm not sure, though, if the essence of the comment is that the query should 
return more than one row. My understanding is that the MOD function is used to 
force one next() call to consider multiple rows before it returns. The MOD 
function in that query makes next() have to consider three rows because only 
every third row qualifies.

It may also be significant that the second argument to the delay function is a 
reference to a column, so that the function has to be invoked for every row.

> Implement JDBC 4.1, the api increment introduced by Java 7
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4869
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4869
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: Drv41.java, JDBC_4.1_Changes.html, 
> derby-4869-01-ac-rs-getObject.diff, derby-4869-01-ad-rs-getObject.diff, 
> derby-4869-02-aa-cs-ps-addBatch.diff, derby-4869-02-ab-cs-ps-addBatch.diff, 
> derby-4869-03-aa-rs-getObject-errorCleanup.diff, 
> derby-4869-04-aa-rs-getObject-simplification.diff, 
> derby-4869-05-aa-rs-getObject-exception.diff, 
> derby-4869-06-aa-cs-getObject.diff, derby-4869-06-ab-cs-getObject.diff, 
> derby-4869-07-aa-timedisplacement.diff, derby-4869-08-ac-nullHandling.diff, 
> derby-4869-09-ac-abort.diff, derby-4869-10-aa-abortSecurityTest.diff, 
> derby-4869-11-aa-abortHidePrivates.diff, 
> derby-4869-12-aa-xaAndPooledAborts.diff, 
> derby-4869-13-aa-xaAndPooledAbortsSecurityManager.diff, 
> derby-4869-14-ac-closeOnCompletion.diff, derby-4869-15-aa-autoGenKeys.diff, 
> derby-4869-16-aa-clarifyStatementSpec.diff, 
> derby-4869-17-aa-statementTimeoutException.diff, 
> derby-4869-18-aa-getSetSchema.diff, 
> derby-4869-19-aa-getSetNetworkTimeout.diff, 
> derby-4869-20-aa-setSchemaFastPath.diff, 
> derby-4869-21-aa-implicitlyClosedResultSets.diff, 
> derby-4869-21-ab-implicitlyClosedResultSets.diff, 
> derby-4869-22-aa-unstableStatementTest.diff, derby-4869-23-aa-dbmd.diff, 
> derby-4869-24-ab-getParentLogger.diff, 
> derby-4869-25-aa-removeClosureCheck.diff, 
> derby-4869-26-aa-signatureTests.diff, derby-4869-27-aa-driver40.diff, 
> derby-4869-28-ab-autoloadExceptionFactory.diff, 
> derby-4869-29-aa-fixAutoloadTest.diff, 
> derby-4869-30-aa-unstableStatementTest.diff, 
> derby-4869-31-aa-unstableStatementTest.diff, 
> derby-4869-exp-01-aa-noTryCatch.diff, disable-tests.diff, timezone.diff
>
>
> This is a master issue logged to track our work implementing JDBC 4.1, the 
> changes to the java.sql and javax.sql packages introduced by Java 7.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Reply via email to