On 6/10/11 5:55 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
Curious, is the intention to have someone push this code base to a
different source code repository, rather than with derby at Apache? Or
is this change only a release management issue?
Hi Dave,
This is a release management issue. So far, no-one has suggested
removing any source code from the Derby repository.
Regards,
-Rick
On 06/10/2011 01:57 PM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
On 6/10/11 9:24 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:06 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
I have already sent a message to the user list with that
information but under the less eye-catching subject line "future of
the Eclipse plugins". Do you think that I should re-send the
message with your revised subject line?
I think so and just reiterate that noone has volunteered so far, so
we don't anticipate them being available anywhere unless someone does.
Thanks. I'll put off doing this for a couple more days in case other
people want to offer advice about how to approach derby-user.
Then when people claim surprise when 10.9 comes out, we will
least have that announcement to point to.
A blurb on the website might be good too.
Where do you think that blurb should go. On the top level download
page?
I think that would be good.
I have just added a blurb to the top level download page. Hopefully,
it will be visible in an hour or so.
Thanks,
-Rick
Thanks for coordinating this. I am not sure how many people pick up
on such warnings, but I do know from past experience that the
surprised and angry ones that don't until it slaps them in the
face, are more understanding after they see the efforts that were
made to warn them.
We should also include the information in the 10.8.2 release
announcement which will extend beyond the Derby community.
Kathey
