Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes: > Going through the message files, I came across the term "SQL-J" in the > ij help text. This is the old name for the original Cloudscape SQL > dialect. It is also confusingly close to the term SQLJ, a largely > moribund effort to integrate SQL with Java. I suspect that we should > not be using the term SQL-J and we should just replace it with the > term SQL. > > What do you think?
+1. I think "SQL" is clearer than "SQL-J" in the ij help message. -- Knut Anders
