+1
on 24/03/2005 21:10, Kathey Marsden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under
> such a cloud of suspicion.  So I would like to call  a vote to reject this
> tally.  I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue either
> technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish that this
> tally is incorrect.  Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions can
> determine how to best choose a logo.
> 
> 
>>> Logo 32 = 20 votes
>>> Logo 35 = 12 votes
>>> None of the above = 18 votes
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> Vote 
> +1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the
> community.
> -1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Kathey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to