+1 Reject the tally I hope people arent voting to reject the proposal just because they didnt like the outcome.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:40:41 -0800, Mike Matrigali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Kathey Marsden wrote: > > > It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo > > under such a cloud of suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to reject > > this tally. I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue > > either technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish > > that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to reject, ensuing > > discussions can determine how to best choose a logo. > > > > > > > >>>Logo 32 = 20 votes > >>>Logo 35 = 12 votes > >>>None of the above = 18 votes > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Vote > > +1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the > > community. > > -1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Kathey > > > > > > > > > > > > >
