Andreas Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 08:51 +0200, Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > >> I think the only fix is to rewrite the class definition code in Derby to >> avoid taking a lock on the helper objects, but I don't know the source >> code well enough to write a proper fix. > > Maybe I should spend more time tweaking before sending email in the > future.. :-) > > The attached patch fixes the problem for me. I'm sure there's more than > this to it, but please feel free to use this a reference. We'll use it > locally and see if anything else creeps up.
Your patch is against Derby 10.1.1.0, but I see that the development sources have changed since that version. Some of the changes are similar to those you proposed. Could you try to run your test using the latest development sources? Thanks! -- Knut Anders
