Mike, I'm not familiar with any recent issue - do you have a reference to a JIRA issue or other info?
No upgrade was involved with this scenario - it was seen on a clean install of 10.1.2.1. Alex Miller Chief Architect MetaMatrix http://www.metamatrix.com -----Original Message----- From: Mike Matrigali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:53 PM To: Derby Discussion Subject: is DERBY-854 related to the recently fixed issue with readonly databases and upgrade? Alex Miller wrote: > I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is > critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode. > Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken > when running in this mode. Thus, read-only databases cannot work with > any tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm > aware of). > > Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases > from a zip file. My company would love to ship some example databases > in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. > > Alex Miller > Chief Architect > MetaMatrix > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:13 PM > To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development > Subject: upcoming 10.2 release > > Dear Derby user community, > > Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing > and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of > April > 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would > estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after > feature freeze. > > Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to > you and which you would like to see fixed in this release. > > Thanks, > -Rick > >
