Mike, I missed your question... which was in the subject. The issue I fixed is different... It was about soft upgrade failing on readonly database.
Satheesh Mike Matrigali wrote: > > Alex Miller wrote: > >> I think DERBY-854 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-854) is >> critical for working with read-only databases in embedded mode. >> Currently, the JDBC DatabaseMetaData methods are completely broken when >> running in this mode. Thus, read-only databases cannot work with any >> tool that imports metadata (which includes most JDBC tools I'm aware >> of). >> Please vote for this bug if you would like to use read-only databases >> from a zip file. My company would love to ship some example databases >> in this way but have given up on Derby due to this bug. >> Alex Miller >> Chief Architect >> MetaMatrix >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rick Hillegas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, >> February 14, 2006 12:13 PM >> To: Derby Discussion; Derby Development >> Subject: upcoming 10.2 release >> >> Dear Derby user community, >> >> Yesterday, the Derby developers started a discussion about the timing >> and contents of the next (10.2) release. A feature freeze date of April >> 7 was suggested although we have not settled on this date yet. I would >> estimate that the actual release would appear around two months after >> feature freeze. >> >> Please let us know about any bugs which are particularly important to >> you and which you would like to see fixed in this release. >> >> Thanks, >> -Rick >> >> > > >
