Andrew McIntyre wrote: >On 2/22/06, Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>2) Will DERBY-668 mean that it won't print the right information >>anyway, even if I get the coding right? >> >> > >Unfortunately, I'm sure this is true. > > Thanks Andrew. I changed the title of DERBY-668 as I think it is a much more serious issue that the title implies. I also filed DERBY-1031 to Test loading Derby in a custom classLoader.
More and more users are loading Derby in class loaders, but some serious issues such as DERBY-700, DERBY-997, and DERBY-668 show that more formalized testing is needed. Kathey
