On 3/16/07, David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Luigi. I looked at this once, and it really didn't seem that the
API provided by the JWS persistence service was sufficient for the needs
of Derby. But I didn't look too closely at it. For me demo needs, a
popup was fine.
What you'd have to do is provide a new implementation of the storage
interface. Others on this list can give you better guidance than I
about where to look and how to do this. I suspect this is not for the
faint of heart...
*But* - if you *did* do this and you were successful, this would be a
Very Good Thing for Derby users (and Java developers) in general, and I
highly recommend that you contribute your work into the Derby codeline.
If he's interested, an example of an alternate implementation of the
StorageFactory interface exists, the in-memory storage factory
attached to DERBY-646:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-646
That might provide some guidance towards getting a JNLP storage factory working.
andrew
