Thank you, Rick, I'll go on learning how to write a custom authenticator. Besides the section at pp. 105-107 of derbydev.pdf, are there any other resources that I could consult?
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected]>wrote: > On 4/12/13 3:49 PM, Al Eridani wrote: > >> This may not be possible out-of-the-box, but here it goes, in case >> someone can help. >> >> We have an application that uses Derby with a single database and, until >> now, with no authentication. >> >> The application can be configured to start Derby with either the embedded >> or client data sources. The client data source is not needed by the >> application, but it is useful to remotely monitor the data. >> >> We would like to require authentication only for remote users, not the >> application. Alternatively, we could live with requiring authentication >> when the application boots Derby using the client data source, but not when >> using the embedded data source. >> >> The documentation does not address this. Does anybody have any ideas? >> Thanks! >> >> Al >> >> Hi Al, > > I don't know any way to do this purely within Derby's public API. However, > you could write your own custom authenticator which checks to see whether > the DRDAConnThread class appears on the stack returned by > Thread.getStackTrace(). DRDAConnThread will only appear on the stack if you > are authenticating a network connection request. Note that there are no > guarantees that this will work in future revs of Derby; however, > DRDAConnThread has been around for 7 years and no-one has suggested > removing it. > > Hope this helps, > -Rick >
