Hey, 2011/2/25 Bernhard Dippold <[email protected]>
> sorry, but I might misinterpret your mail, because I don't remember whom > you are citing (and you don't mention the author): > Sorry for that. For me the whole discussion is a single thread in gmail. I'll remember to add the names in the future when necessary. I was quoting Martin. I have done two alternative ligatures, maybe they are better suited for the font, since they're not so obtrusive. You can see them here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Joey#Alternative_Ligatures > PS: It seems that my latest mails to this list sound a bit negative - they > aren't > meant at all as criticism! > I fully support your approach to improve the logo by balancing the > character > distances and the general visual impression. I hope you take my comments > as positive and constructive contribution to an important task! > No offense taken =). It's really great of you all to give positive criticism and I value all your opinions, so thanks! One thing, though. Christoph, you said that people from China or countries with different alphabets might have problems reading ligatures. Is that really the case? I always thought it was easier to read texts with ligatures, because you don't read the distinct characters anyway but you rather perceive stuff like the shape of the headline and vertical bars etc.? That's an interesting topic, I'll have a look into this... Joey -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
