Bernhard On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 22:47 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> Hi Marc, all, > > While [UX] is quite universal understood, I want you to think (and > decide) about a short tag for Visual Identity / Branding Design. > Marc mentioned the necessity for newcomers to understand the tag, but I > think most of us agree to keeping as much room for a descriptive subject. > > Possible tags would be: > [VI] for Visual Identity > [BD] for Branding Design > [VD] for Visual Design > [ViDes] for Visual Design > > None of them are self-descriptive, but we should provide a wiki page for > new members where such abbreviations have to be explained (together with > more general information about our team). > > What do you like most? > (I for one prefer [VD]) > > Could you just add "+1" to the tag of your preference? > > Best regards > > Bernhard > VD has nasty connotations in English at least in the US, short for venereal disease or sexually transmitted disease. I would use ViDes instead to avoid embarrassment with some English speakers. -- Jay Lozier [email protected] -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
