Hi Loic, hi all! I've refined the interaction design a bit and uploaded it to the wiki - replacing the file you've uploaded for me (thanks!): http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bug_Submission_Assistant_-_ToDo#Web_design
Comments on the new version: * It is still a draft ... * I refined the structure so that it matches better with the design proposal you've send to me (navigation on the left side, more dominant header). * Added a few more steps and thought a bit how things could be explained in a rather user-friendly language (whereas I tried to be as understandable as possible until the bug report assistant is entered). * I've tried to follow your current workflow, added snippets provided by Michael and Rainer ... and considered "getting help" and "joining a user survey". However, the essential part "bug report" would also work "stand-alone". * The structure contains a lot of "Full Description" elements - added for scalability reasons, if the normal field size is too small. So, they can be removed if not needed. * Personally, I think the structure is just a contain to add the real workflow like the one by Michael. I don't know what's currently planned, but it would provide more guidance (asking for crashes, rendering fidelity ...). * I've left some placeholders due to missing time and missing knowledge, here it would be great if the others could jump in to help us finalize the work. * I might have missed some (or many) details, since I've tried to avoid reading further mails this evening ... aehm ... night :-) * And, grr, already found some caption mistakes after uploading ... but that doesn't affect the concept. Feedback appreciated ... :-) Since this mail is send to the QA list / Design list as well, I'll keep most of the discussion we had so far. Am Dienstag, den 13.09.2011, 10:01 +0200 schrieb Loic Dachary: > On 09/13/2011 12:44 AM, Christoph Noack wrote: [...] > > So I've started to read most of the specs lying around and tried to > > understand the motivation by Rainer and Michael. Next, I've tried you > > bug report assistant and read the mails discussing that topic on the > > mailing list. Finally, I've tried to come up with my own point-of-view > > in a mockup (which is far from being completed): > > https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/w31yhEvxH3xkTt1YYwvjkA?feat=directlink > > > It's a great illustration of what I have in mind, except for the left > part which is outside the scope of the bug submission assistant (I > hope ;-). I wish I would be able to do such nice schematics. Thanks :-) > > A first feedback from your side would be great! > > > > Some comments: > > * The "intermediate page" that allows people to provide feedback > > via different methods is something I'd like to have for our > > users. To me, it seems less important for your work I guess. > yes. > > * I assumed that the content is embedded into some other website, > > e.g. the LibreOffice website. > yes, in an iframe https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bugTest/?stage=Stage > > * The first step is a mixture of Michael's proposal and the one > > I've made ago ... selecting the main components via buttons (or > > whatever can be done) and offering a container (or whatever...) > > to provide a full list if people are able to understand that. > I understand the rationale. > > * Next, the whole design doesn't feel right yet ... unfortunately > > we lack the time for relaxed iterations, so it should be > > considered as "something". > > * I've added the mockup to Picasa if you want to discuss it with > > other people ... > > * Like the usual usability driven mockups, the visual design isn't > > available (missing colors icons, ...). Thus ... > I got a design proposal that implements your "Report a Problem" box, I think > (see attached). What do you think ? I think it will work well ... I had a few concerns whether people understand the sequence of the steps (at the moment, it rather looks like the tabs in recent software or on websites), but for a first iteration it's great. The only things I'd like to mention are that we usually don't use drop shadows and that we try to use lots of white - so the header may be a bit too dominant. > > For the visual design, we currently have the following resources: [... already added to the wiki page by your side ...] > > Maybe this helps to get an idea how the final design could look like. > > > It makes things a lot clearer for me, indeed. > The only thing I'll be missing is someone to slice the images from the > mockup, so that I can work the CSS/HTML integration. I have limited > skills with regard to producing images for background, buttons etc. > and the web designer won't do it. I hope somebody can jump in - as I mentioned before, joining tomorrow (maybe even the day after) is impossible :-\ > This is going to be good, I feel it :-) Hehe, that sounds good ... its fun to work on that. And its extra fun, because of the great resources available you've made available (pictures, prototype, ...). Cheers, Christoph -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted