The real issue of LO design projects is that there aren't developers interested in working UI continually. The design team could discuss and provide some interesting mockups, but this not means it will come up someone developing them.
It happened with color picker and with UI easy hacks: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Blueprints Hundred of easy hacks, even more complex, were solved by newcomer programmers in the last years, but those small UI hacks are still there with almost none caring about them. I'm not bothering anyone, just saying what are the facts. Other open-source projects ( Gnome, KDE, Elementary, Cinnamon...) are doing great innovations in design and UI/UX because their programmers are interested in doing it. Instead, LO sticks with a 2003 UI until there will be devs willing to work on this topic. Someone on this list agree about changes, someone not, but what I am saying is that the "stagnant" attitude isn't really a choice, just a lack of manpower to code UI innovation. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Sidebar-Problem-tp4094331p4107099.html Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
