I'm not against this idea at all. It seems perfectly reasonable. Why light blue, instead of a light grey?
This is my first time responding to a thread in this group; am I allowed to do so? On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Pedro <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > Displaying Non-printing characters is a commonly used feature by people > formatting documents (or cleaning up oddly formatted text). > I think it's a great idea to have the symbols in another colour. But Light > Blue is hard to see (especially in thin fonts) or maybe it's just my eyes > getting older... > > Wouldn't it be possible to add an option to allow the user to select the > colour? (It could be Light Blue as default). > > Since version 4.3 is still in Beta stage the option could be added now > before the change to mandatory Light Blue occurs... > > I can add a Feature Request in the Tracker if people agree that this makes > sense... > > Thanks! > > Pedro > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Light-Blue-for-Non-printing-characters-tp4110478.html > Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- Antonio Garcia 773.336.2259 [email protected] -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
