Hi Milan, all
nalimilan wrote >> I think that adding the option to allow the user to select a colour would >> require only to add a new entry in the Options dialog (under LibreOffice >> > >> Appearance > Custom colours > General) named Non-printing characters. > > Please, no. The options dialog is already crowded enough with obscure > options. If blue is hard to see for some users, we need to find a better > color, period. You cannot expect users who find it hard to see the light > blue to find out that an option exists buried somewhere in the options, > only a few experts will; and the bulk of users will think LibreOffice is > a bad program. The point here is: the non-printing characters are already set to light blue in 4.3 . Someone already did that https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.3#Light_Blue_for_Non-printing_characters LibreOffice is NOT a democracy so setting up a vote for another colour won't have any results unless someone actually codes it. But coding another colour without consulting or the agreement of the developer who introduced the change would be a very BAD attitude... Unless we can convince the author that light blue is not a good option it WILL be set to light blue on the next version. Personally I would prefer to have an OPTION, than to have some other hard-coded colour. Just my 2 cents. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Light-Blue-for-Non-printing-characters-tp4110478p4110841.html Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
