That also rise the question of accessibility. Do anyone have a real UX
feedback on how this kind of symbols are rendered with sound synthetizer
and braille devices?
Le 2013-11-13 15:54, Jared Zimmerman a écrit :
I like the Default (unspecified) fonts ↑ 100% bold but I partly
question why we'd use a character at all rather than an SVG graphic
we
have more control over. It certainly seems overkill to use webfonts
for this unless we're using an iconfont.
JARED ZIMMERMAN \ Director of User Experience \ Wikimedia
Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman [3]
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Quiddity <[email protected]>
wrote:
Most Wikimedia sites use the mediawiki default of an Arrow ↑ to
backlink from citation-contents to the superscripted number/letter.
English Wikipedia changed the default in 2006, to use a caret ^ and
a few dozen other wikis have copied that.
We'd like to examine the problems with the Arrow, to see if they can
be fixed.
We need help browser-testing and diagnosing and fixing the
problem(s).
This may have strong relevancy to the Typography Update in Beta
Features.
I've tried to summarize everything so far, at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Cite_messages#Testing_and_summary_so_far
[1]
Thanks!
Quiddity
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design [2]
Links:
------
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Cite_messages#Testing_and_summary_so_far
[2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
[3] https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
--
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
