I think James's suggestions are good,  perhaps we could go further with the 
image changes (I'll find my conversation with the multimedia team) and roll it 
out as a small beta feature owned by that team?

We can talk further with the multimedia PM?

Sent while mobile

On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Steven Walling <[email protected]> wrote:

I don't really think those things about TOC and external links are a big deal 
or blockers. They seem pretty nit-picky to me. 




> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Quiddity <[email protected]> wrote:
> First, the happy feedback:
> The Thumbnail styles are currently being discussed at
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VPT#New_image_thumb_design
> Onwiki feedback, and further ideas, encouraged!
> 
> 
>> On 14-03-28 05:02 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Jon Robson wrote:
>> 
>>     3) Submit each of these as patches to Gerrit (unless there are any
>>     complaints)
>> 
>> 
>> This is my suggestion.
>> 
>> Some of these are pretty uncontroversial, like the TOC and the external
>> links change (which is a performance improvement and not a single beat
>> tester said anything negative about). Others of these require more
>> thought, like the thumbnail style and the blockquote styles. The easy
>> ones should just be iterated on a bit, and each submitted as patches
>> separately to discuss and potentially merge.
> 
> 
> The ToC changes were not uncontroversial.
> 
> * https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Typography_refresh/Archive_2#TOC_broken
> * 
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Typography_refresh/Archive_2#I_don.27t_like_the_minimalist_styling
> 
> The lack of bullet points becomes a problem when linewrap occurs, eg.
> http://i.imgur.com/uBpLLuZ.png vs http://i.imgur.com/RI9ZSBL.png
> 
> The lack of numbers will cause issues for the 31,636[1] users who have the 
> "Auto-number headings" userpreference enabled at Enwiki (plus more elsewhere).
> 
> I still suggest using this code, which results in this look:
> http://i.imgur.com/k3ipFKz.png
> * Tweak Table of Contents boxes, to have smaller grey numbers and 
> dot-suffixes */
> .tocnumber:after, .mw-headline-number:after { content: "." }
> .tocnumber, .mw-headline-number { font-size: 80% !important; color:#333 
> !important;}
> 
> Or, at minimum, move the ToC-numbering into the code for the "Auto-number 
> headings" preference (a logical home), and just use bulletpoints for the 
> default, as lists generally do. Style them however wanted, but we need 
> /something/.
> 
> [1] https://trello.com/c/tIsqX5LB/123-numberheadings-research-for-nick
> 
> -----
> 
> The external link icon changes are not uncontroversial.
> 
> nb. This is related to: http://i.imgur.com/VU0Ezcn.png (current vs Typography 
> refresh/VectorBeta)
> 
> This was last discussed here 
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/design/2013-October/001039.html (my 
> post, mid-way in thread) and the only thing there seemed to be consensus on 
> was: replacing the yellow https icon with either the blue-colored one or the 
> plain external link one.
> 
> I think the Principle of Least Astonishment applies to many of those ext-link 
> icons, such as the media links which might trigger the auto-playing of a loud 
> audio sample. Definitely some of them are ripe for removal (such as "news:"; 
> links), but not all, and it's worth discussing them properly before deciding.
> 
> Where is the current CSS code for this stored? (both gitblit and/or onwiki)
> 
> and how cross-wiki is the complexity?
> (ie. are there local CSS files at dozens of wikis which might have different 
> icons? All I can find easily is the linked Italian one
> https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiuto:Icone_dei_link_esterni
> 
> Would "Merging" icons/rules also be a possibility and helpful for reducing 
> CSS payload size? e.g. 1 "media" icon, instead of 2 for "audio" and "video"
> 
> Sidenote mostly for interest/comparison: Monobook (& Modern) uses a different 
> set of icons:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Help:External_link_icons&useskin=monobook
>  
> 
> *TL;DR*: I'm 110% in favour of replacing the yellow padlock with the blue 
> padlock.  The rest should probably be split out, and given a brief discussion 
> onwiki, listing pros & cons.
> I'd personally strongly support some changes, and weakly oppose other changes.
> 
> 
> --Quiddity
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design



-- 
Steven Walling,
Product Manager
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to