Bartosz, I think you and I are on the same page here. Shahyar agreed we'd proceed as-designed and do some iterative testing. Does that sound right Shahyar? If you have the time, to implement both styles we could do split testing with both via usertesting.com
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Shahyar Ghobadpour < [email protected]> wrote: > It's less for drawing attention to it, but rather to make the action > itself clear on hover and focus. In an inactive state, it has a toned down > style to avoid unnecessarily attracting eyes to non content areas. > > --Shahyar > On Apr 5, 2014 1:49 PM, "Bartosz Dziewoński" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:30:07 +0200, Shahyar Ghobadpour < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Non-primary buttons will often still have context (eg. destructive for >>> "Discard"). We'd like to allow these to remain, without overly drawing away >>> from the primary action. >>> >> >> I think this would be overengineered. The non-primary button should be >> just that - a dimmed, non-colored non-primary button. We shouldn't draw >> attention to it with colors. >> >> -- >> Matma Rex >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Design mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >> > > _______________________________________________ > Design mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design > >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
