Steven, from the very beginning of Beta Features we acknowledged their
would be Beta Features that were only for experimenting and exploring, that
they wouldn't graduate. So this isn't a concern of mine. I think the only
way we'll be able to get a good solid review of the controls, both
internally and from users is to package it up as a beta feature and let
people use the real production site with all the new controls in place.
Matt's test instance is great but won't serve the same purpose.



*Jared Zimmerman * \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation

M +1 415 609 4043 \\  @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0>



On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Steven Walling <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Jared Zimmerman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I've been thinking about this for a bit. my suggestion is this…
>>
>>
>> We create 3 more controls
>>
>>    - Dropdown <https://trello.com/c/bdpbPSZT/4-drawer-menu>
>>    (can Juliusz's work on compact person bar be componentized?)
>>    - Search Field <https://trello.com/c/MC8ovuyw/2-advanced-input-fields>
>>    - Radio Button <https://trello.com/c/df2N2KJx/8-radio-buttons>
>>
>> Finalize 2 controls
>>
>>    - Check box (disabled state, disabled checked)
>>    - Vform (vertical padding)
>>
>> Then let's make a Beta feature to allow people to test and see
>> medaiwiki.ui in context in vector(at least) and report problems.
>>
>> I'd love to be able to provide a fixed element on screen that allows
>> someone to quickly and easily report problems with a control on a
>> particular page (isn't using mediawiki.ui style, isn't using right type
>> (progressive, constructive, destructive) and right style normal, quiet,
>> etc. and any issues around order or logic, e.g. on WTE Save should be the
>> rightmost according to mediawiki.ui guidelines and there are too many
>> Primary style buttons.
>>
>> *Jon*, perhaps you could brainstorm a fixed header element that allows
>> someone to report an issue on their current page that generates bug reports
>> or emails or something along those lines?
>>
>> Is there any way we could accelerate fixes reported by users more than
>> our normal time span of 2-3 weeks? cc'ing *Greg* for his thoughts here
>> about a way to do this without breaking things.
>>
>> This won't be our first Beta feature that is more for learning and
>> testing with no plans to graduate but we should be clear that that's what
>> its for in the description on the beta page, so people can give helpful and
>> constructive feedback knowing that it will be an iterative process.
>>
>
> Like Erik said, we need to not be in a rush here. This thing is kind of a
> mess and needs some basic design review first, before we charge ahead with
> expanding the scope into new controls or a reporting tool like you
> suggested. I also am very uncomfortable saying we should release a Beta
> Feature we don't intend to graduate.
>
> --
> Steven Walling,
> Product Manager
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to