Hi folks, As WMF looks to clarify its role for UX changes, I think it's important to look at other examples, and initial reactions to major design changes. It's also important to understand which efforts have succeeded and failed.
Here are examples that I can think of: 1) NYT redesign <http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/times-designers-are-monitoring-reaction-to-the-redesign-with-adjustments-possible/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs®ion=Body> (1000+ comments, mostly negative). 2) Flickr redesign <https://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157633547442506/> (if you think disputes in Wikimedia can be unpleasant ..). Even their recent changes <https://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157642911765443/> to the photo view got similar reactions. 3) Slashdot redesign <http://meta.slashdot.org/story/13/10/01/1849218/come-try-out-slashdots-new-design-in-beta> (which led to - ongoing - protests and boycott suggestions) 4) Gawker redesign <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gawker_Media#2011_redesign_and_traffic_loss> (which by all accounts was a failure - PVs declined) - anyone got a comment thread for this one? 5) Wikia 2010 redesign, which led to many wikis forking (including the World of Warcraft Wiki) and the formation of an Anti-Wikia Alliance <http://awa.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Anti-Wikia_Alliance> Others you can think of? Other than Gawker, what's the evidence for success/failure of the above changes? What are examples of really successful major UX changes that were welcomed by communities, if any? Thanks, Erik -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
