I agree with alot of what Jeremy said. Here was the email I was
working on before I read his:
Maybe I am wrong, but most people I know don't care about timezones.
They live and work within the same timezone and don't travel
extensively for their job. What they do care about is "What time is
that meeting I have on Thursday?" and the usual answer is 2pm, not
14:00 PST.
But, when you are a mobile warrior and you are scheduling things with
people, you do care about timezones. You want to make sure that the
events that you schedule and attend are properly specified with
timezones. Then you can adjust your view to display your calendar in
whatever timezone you are currently in. This means that if you had a
meeting scheduled today at 2pm PST, when you switch your timezone to
EST, that event should shift to 5pm EST. This allows you to easily
make sure that you're not committing to conflicting events at the
same time (or at least you aren't doing it without knowing it!)
So, I guess to summarize:
1. I think its important that users have a default timezone that is
their home timezone. When they send requests for meetings, those
events are encoded with times that include their timezone. This
easily handles the case of the user that stays home and doesn't travel.
2. I think its also important to allow the mobile warrior to turn on
the ability to change their timezone view from their default timezone
to the one they are actually in. That way they won't miss that 2pm
PST conference call they need to make at 5pm EST.
3. I like the iCal model that Apple puts forth. You set a preference
that says that I want to turn on timezone support. At that point,
timezones start to appear and can be changed in views and when
creating events. Otherwise, it handles it for you.
4. Couldn't we just ask the user to tell us their timezone the first
time they signin to scooby? (And make it available as a user
preference so they can change it.)
Anyway, just my two cents. I am the new guy to this conversation, so
I might not fully understand all of the issues involved.
--> towns
On Apr 19, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Jeremy Epstein wrote:
Just to chime in, one thing you might want to take into account is
"when" a user would actually care. Personally, If I were making
appointments (even if I knew I were traveling) I would not concern
t myself with timezone. -- I would always expect my calendar to be
in my "home" time zone, or even better, not care about timezone
unless it may cause a conflict such as the two circumstances below:
*For me, there are only two circumstances where the timezone I am
in matters: *
1) if an appointment I am making might conflict with travel
across timezones (such as an international flight) This is a very
strange case. It means I have an event (airplane flight) that
starts in one timezone, and ends in another!
2) if I am planning a conference call across timezones, i.e. if
I have a phone meeting with a matthew and bobby. In the conference
call case, I would expect the event to list all the times for all
the parties involved: (12:00 noon my calendar time, 2:00pm
matthews time)
Another example of why I would not want any calendar changing time
zones without my explicit control:
I am traveling to a conference in Chicago, and I make an
appointment to meet a colleague for lunch (12:00), even though
(12:00) in Pacific Standard Time(my "home" time zone) would
nominally translate to 2:00 pm Chicago time. However, I KNOW I am
going to Chicago, and if I set an appointment for 12:00 noon, I
would assume its for 12:00 noon whether I am in Chicago or San
Francisco. Since chandler has no notion of geographic travel, I
don't want it switching time zones on me. Also, I don't want to do
the mental math required to set a lunch date of 2:00:pm Pacific
Standard Time (my "home" time zone) just to make sure the lunch
date appears at noon when I arrive in Chicago and my calendar
resets its timezone or I connect from an Internet cafe with a
computer whose clock is set to Central Standard Time. Does this
make sense?
One last thing, it may simply suffice when traveling to show two
clocks on somewhere on the calendar display: Calendar time, and
current geographic time.
Apologies for the long note.
Jeremy Epstein
Bobby Rullo wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Steve Lewis wrote:
Bobby Rullo wrote:
Also possibly a 3rd:
3. System "guesses" initial timezone based on IP address to
location table for initial log in
[delurk]
A fourth possibility would be to detect their timezone every time
they
log in. If the current client's detected timezone is different,
ask the
user if he/she would like to adjust the user's timezone, and the
calendar view, to use the detected time zone or continue to use the
stored timezone.
Interesting idea. We'd have to make it annoying proof so that the
dude who always wants their timezone to be EST even though they
are in CA doesn't get harassed.
You can determine the timezone without the IP address to location
table
which has a significant margin of error.
As a hint toward implementation, adapt or adopt this javascript
library:
http://west.ilrn.com/media/js/systemCheck/timezone.js
That only works if the system's time has changed. Like someone
went to the System Preferences panel and clicked "change timezone"
Might not always be the case for laptop users who are bouncing
around a lot.
and then search java.util.TimeZone for a timezone that has the same
summer and winter DST offsets, then filter that down further by
timezones that switch DST at the amount. This will often give
several
possible but equivalent matches. Programmatically solve this by
always
choosing one, e.g. the first.
The problem I see with this approach is that it would have to
favor some locale's over others - New York and Buenos Aires might
have the same offset, but which one would appear first in the
list? Americans would be annoyed if Buenos Aires always appeared
first because it begins with B and Argentineans would be annoyed
if New York appeared first just because it's American...
Is the margin of error for IP address tables really that bad? We
don't have to get within a block, just within the general region.
I thought they were ok for that, but don't really have any data to
support it either way.
Bobby
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
