Grant,
Those are great suggestions. I will work with Mimi to make those edits.
Thanks,
Sheila
On May 26, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Grant Baillie wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 11:50, Sheila Mooney wrote:
Mimi and I have put together the first draft of the 0.7 stamping
spec for review. This details the motivations behind stamping, the
usage scenarios and the visual affordances we need in order to
make this work. As discussed in the staff meeting today, stamping
will now be an Alpha4 goal and Mimi and I will be working with
Grant to figure out what functionality needs to be staged beyond
Alpha4.
http://svn.osafoundation.org/docs/trunk/docs/specs/rel0_7/
Stamping-0.7.html
Stamping is very tightly coupled with some of the dashboard work
and I hope to have a dashboard draft ready for the list in a
couple of days.
I have also added this link to the spec list in the 0.7 planning
page.
Hi, Sheila et al
A couple of editorial comments after my first reading:
- The "Communications Column" section would be a lot clearer if the
second bullet item ("The user can click on the Communications
status column to cycle ...") were moved to before the first.
- The 36-item list of different column states is a little daunting.
It might be nice to preface this with a summary of how the Who
column will display some of that state (via "UP"/"TO"/"FR"). It was
also unclear to me (till Mimi explained it) that the "Unread",
"Read" and "Needs Reply" states referred to communications with no
addressing information.
--Grant
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
