On Sep 12, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Bryan Stearns wrote:
Or, as a separate suggestion, Is it time to reconsider whether occurrences belong in collections? (I'm under the impression that it's to simplify sharing, but since sharing already has to special- case private items in shared collections, maybe special-casing occurrences at the same level would be no harder?)
I believe at one time occurrences were in the collections, and the sharing layer did skip over them. Or it could be that Jeffrey and I once discussed this option a while back. I think it would be possible, from the sharing standpoint to put occurrences in collections, if needed.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
