--- Begin Message ---
Hey Markku,
You have raised an excellent point, the one that I have been thinking
about the most lately.:)
Consider that a lot of mails have tags like "[a timestamp] XXX wrote"
or equivalent depending on the email client and used locale. These
timestamps clearly do not imply that the mail is an event; .. Hence, I
do not see how you would be able to make proper classification without
good semantic understanding of the mail content. If you have ideas on
how to implement that please send them to this forum and I will be
happy to participate in a discussion of their the pros and cons.
The solution to this is that to just parse the body of the current email
and not the earlier emails in the same body(the email to which this
current email was a reply/forward). In case, the previous email is added
as an attachment or marked with some visual symbol like >>> or | , as
most mail clients do, it would be easier to figure out what to parse.
But I dont know how to do this yet or whether this is feasible or not.
Any suggestions you have will be welcome.
Thanks.
-Darshana
--- End Message ---
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
