We have found a potential bug that corrupts a users' calendar data if
they edit calendars (published from Chandler) from the Cosmo UI. I
unfortunately can't give you more info than that since we are still
in the process of investigating this further to determine if this is
indeed the problem.
In the meantime, I just wanted to remind everyone that Cosmo 0.5 is
not fully dogfoodable yet. We haven't had the opportunity to do the
type of dogfood testing on the Cosmo UI that we have done with
Chandler. Testing out the Cosmo UI and logging QA bugs is welcome and
encouraged since it helps us get Cosmo to a more stable state.
However, trying to edit real calendar data with Cosmo is somewhat
risky at this stage and we recommend you try this with test calendars
only.
Just to set expectations, if we find problems Chandler to Chandler
sharing we would consider a patch to fix this so we do not block
Chandler dogfooding. Bugs found using the Cosmo UI will simply be
logged and fixed in the next release since we are not at the stage in
the project where dogfood maintainability is a goal. Cosmo 0.6 will
be our "first dogfoodable release" and implies we will have higher
stability expectations for Cosmo UI in the next iteration.
Cheers,
Sheila
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
