For what it's worth, I feel a bit uneasy about putting in a list of specific apps other than Chandler.

1. The list of apps that do some kind of calendaring could be humongous.
2. How do you decide which apps make the cut and get on the menu?
3. The formats that these apps support will change.

I think we should try to keep it as simple and focused as we can.

My two cents. :)


M.

the number of different applications in this menu is starting to look

silly. and what about apps that support both webcal and caldav

(sunbird, evolution, ical in 2007)?


I agree it is looking silly, but this is how we're looking to deal with multiple subscriptions for now in 0.6. Or we could **not** deal with the additional subscriptions and primarily focus on Chandler, iCal and Feed, which is the original proposal for 0.6.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to