At 09:33 AM 1/24/2007 -0800, Mimi Yin wrote:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/NoDataLossProposal#WorkflowTwo
The top should probably say something like "There are 5 pending changes from your collaborators that could not be applied because they would overwrite local changes". Maybe not that phrasing, but something to indicate that the reason Chandler didn't just do these changes is that you're going to possibly lose something by applying them.
Other than that, +1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
