I'm wondering if that's obvious to the user?
I'm tempted to replace 'overwrite local changes' with 'overwrite your
changes', except that, that's not always true, because somebody
else's changes may have been applied either via an update or sharing
edits.
Let's keep it to "There are 5 pending changes." and see what kind of
confusion that incurs before tweaking the wording?
Mimi :o)
On Jan 24, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 09:33 AM 1/24/2007 -0800, Mimi Yin wrote:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/NoDataLossProposal#WorkflowTwo
The top should probably say something like "There are 5 pending
changes from your collaborators that could not be applied because
they would overwrite local changes". Maybe not that phrasing, but
something to indicate that the reason Chandler didn't just do these
changes is that you're going to possibly lose something by applying
them.
Other than that, +1.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
