Hi, see below.
On Mar 8, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:
On 6 Mar, 2007, at 15:28, Mimi Yin wrote:
Morgen, I'm fine with prompting users with a name. But I wonder if
it's clutter to have
Created by Morgen Sagen on xxx for every item in your Chandler if
you don't share or send any email?
Possibly, though we could just shorten "Morgen Sagen" to "Me" in
this case.
Sure. I think not having a Creator reference at all, if it's trivial
is maybe best. Wouldn't want to use it in vain.
I think the idea was that if the user wasn't doing any of these
'Reach out and touch someone outside of your personal Chandler
repository' things, then we'd only display date info in the byline.
That's possible ... We will have to deal with that case already (no
lastModifiedBy) for items that have been edited on the server
anonymously (i.e. ticketed Cosmo UI users).
Yes. Should we just make a name instead? Cal? Junebug? Igor? Nohbdy?
Ben Dover? Rhea Pollster?
Or, we could be boring and say Edited by Anonymous on xxx
Cosmo uses the email address to do the whole receive an email
confirmation and then verify the new account.
Sure, but I'm not sure how that applies here ... i.e. in the
ticketed case, there's no account to confirm?
Oh I was talking about using the email address from the Sharing
account dialog in Chandler. Morgen was asking why there was one
associated with the sharing account at all.
Mimi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
